 | Dr. Dobb's Says AI is OK Again |
Posted 10 Sep 2007 at 22:00 UTC by steve  |
I think the *goal* of artifical intelligence is quite aggressive. But just like eliminating cancer, it's a fine goal to have.
My guess is the average person actually expected, because the field is called artifical inteeligence, that there would be computers-just-like-people in a year or two. I think if we called it Ultimately We'd Like Some Sort of Adaptive Apparent Cognition, it would have fallen flat long before you could finish saying it (and the acronym is pretty painful, too).
So I say we continue to strive for AI, and still be happy with the steps in between.
Best Regards,
HAL 9000
Indeed, "the balance in AI work seems to be tipped toward applied
over theoretical". But I feel there is an important aspect
of this
fact that deserves more attention. It is the performance
of human consciousness
that has been neglected in AI work.
Human consciousness is the capability to represent
oneself as existing, with the corresponding free will and
capability
to introspect. This key performance of human mind has not
been really
taken into account in AI work so far, be it connectionist
or symbolist.
The reason for that may be our lack of understanding of
human consciousness.
Only in recent years have we seen a growing interest
towards the field
of artificial consciousness. It can be a good starting
point on this
subject. And it may have an interesting future.
(see for instance http://www.consciousness.it/CAI/CAI.htm)
Best Regards
Christophe Menant