<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>robots.net blog for Christophe Menant</title>
    <link>http://robots.net/person/Christophe Menant/</link>
    <description>robots.net blog for Christophe Menant</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <generator>mod_virgule</generator>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 12:04:43 GMT</pubDate>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 20:48:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>11 Dec 2012</title>
      <link>http://robots.net/person/Christophe Menant/diary.html?start=2</link>
      <guid>http://robots.net/person/Christophe Menant/diary.html?start=2</guid>
      <description>Turing Test, Chinese Room Argument, Symbol Grounding Problem. Meanings in Artificial Agents.&lt;br/&gt;
 Turing Test (TT), Chinese Room Argument (CRA) &amp; Symbol Grounding Problem (SGP) are basic tools for investigating the possibilities for artificial agents (AAs) to behave as humans.&lt;br/&gt;
 An analysis of these three tools has been proposed under the banner of &#x201C;meaning generation&#x201D; (AISB/IACAP 2012 presentation). It is shown that the capability for an AA to generate human like meanings can be a reading of TT, CRA &amp; SGP (1). We use the Meaning Generator System (MGS) that can be used for any agent submitted to a constraint (2). The concerns are that animal and human constraints are not today transferrable to AAs. An entry point is proposed by extending a &#x201C;stay alive&#x201D; constraint to AAs. &lt;br/&gt;
Ethical concerns are highlighted. Continuations are proposed.&lt;br/&gt;
Paper is available at http://cogprints.org/8716/ and in proceedings at  http://www.mrtc.mdh.se/~gdc/work/AISB-IACAP-2012/NaturalComputingProceedings-2012-06-22.pdf&lt;br/&gt;
 Christophe Menant&lt;br/&gt;
 (1) http://crmenant.free.fr/IACAP-AISB2012-C.Menant-050712.pdf&lt;br/&gt;
 (2) http://cogprints.org/3694/</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 13:10:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>14 Oct 2011</title>
      <link>http://robots.net/person/Christophe Menant/diary.html?start=1</link>
      <guid>http://robots.net/person/Christophe Menant/diary.html?start=1</guid>
      <description>IACAP 2011 presentation on cognition as management of meanings:&lt;br/&gt;
Cognition is proposed as a management of meanings for agents that have constraints to satisfy (stay alive, look for happiness, avoid obstacles, &#x2026;).&lt;br/&gt;
(IACAP 2011 presentation http://cogprints.org/7584/)&lt;br/&gt;
The systemic approach to meaning generation for agents is used in an evolutionary perspective to cognition where robots are agents with derived constraints, meanings and intentionality.&lt;br/&gt;
Christophe Menant (http://crmenant.free.fr/Home-Page/index.HTM)&lt;br/&gt;
</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 19:22:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>16 Mar 2011</title>
      <link>http://robots.net/person/Christophe Menant/diary.html?start=0</link>
      <guid>http://robots.net/person/Christophe Menant/diary.html?start=0</guid>
      <description> &lt;b&gt;Systemic approach to meaningful &#xD;
representations.&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&#xD;
    An existing &lt;a href="http://crmenant.free.fr/ResUK/MGS.pdf" &gt;systemic &#xD;
approach &#xD;
    to meaning generation&lt;/a&gt; (usable for animals, humans &#xD;
and robots) has recently &#xD;
    been extended to the notion of meaningful &#xD;
representation. &lt;br&gt;&#xD;
    The starting point is a system submitted to a &#xD;
constraint (stay alive, avoid &#xD;
    obstacle, ..) that receives information from its &#xD;
environment and compares &#xD;
    it with its constraint. &lt;br&gt;&#xD;
    The generated meaning is the connection existing &#xD;
between the received information &#xD;
    and the constraint. It triggers an action aimed at &#xD;
satisfying the constraint &#xD;
    (avoid predator, turn right/left, ..). &lt;br&gt;&#xD;
    A Meaning Generator System (MGS) has been introduced. &#xD;
It can be used for any &#xD;
    agent submitted to constraints. &lt;br&gt;&#xD;
    The notion of meaningful representation of an entity &#xD;
for an agent is defined &#xD;
    as being the networks of meanings related to the &#xD;
entity, with the action scenarios.&lt;br&gt;&#xD;
    See&lt;a href="http://www.idt.mdh.se/ECAP-&#xD;
2005/INFOCOMPBOOK/CHAPTERS/10-Menant.pdf" &gt; &#xD;
    book chapter &lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://crmenant.free.fr/IACAP.2011.Abstract/IACAP_201&#xD;
1_C.Menant_Extended_Abstract20110316155452.pdf" &gt;IACAP &#xD;
    2011 proposed abstract &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&#xD;
    Such meaningful representations are used in the &#xD;
approach on artificial consciousness &#xD;
    based on self-consciousness (&lt;a href="http://robots.net/article/2244.html" &gt;http://robots.ne&#xD;
t/article/2244.html&lt;/a&gt;).&lt;br&gt;&#xD;
    More is to come on this. &lt;br&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;a href="http://crmenant.free.fr/Home-&#xD;
Page/index.HTM" &gt;Christophe Menant &lt;/a&gt;&#xD;
</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
